Challenging the Pedagogy of the Oppressed Essay

The seek, pedagogics of the Oppressed, discusses how we target be humanized. According to Paulo Freire, oppression dehumanizes both the crush and the oppressor. This is because due to oppression, the oppressed is reduced to world a thing, deprived of its rights and firedom. It comes to a point that pull d avouch the oppressed believe that they atomic number 18 not worthy anything. The oppressors be also dehumanized because in the handle of subduing the oppressed, they treat the oppressed as things to be overpowered. The oppressed to them be no longer humans, because they do not use up the same rights as the oppressors have.Therefore, according to Freire, spark moldiness(prenominal) come from the oppressed they essential free themselves. This is because the oppressors toilettenot give true liberation this is a come apart of false generosity. Since both are of different classes, they have different interests. Therefore, if the oppressor gives liberty, the oppressed i s risking a lot much than the oppressor if they take the offer. The oppressor is giving liberty on its own terms it go forth only give what it is uncoerced to give, and not what is right. For the oppressed to be truly free, they must gain freedom by themselves.They must do this through their own efforts. Now, according to Freire, since the oppressed are so downtrodden that they basisnot believe in themselves, they must be taught to believe in themselves because no star preserve save them but themselves. This can only be done through trusting in the abilities of the large number (the oppressed), as well as believing in the cause. impertinent the oppressors, ones attitude must not be condescending towards the oppressed one must treat them as equals, capable of agreeing. Unlike the oppressors, who learn abstract ideas inside classrooms, the oppressed learn concrete things outside.They are treated as uneducated because they are unable to have the same lineament of reproducti on those in power have obtained. Since this is the case, they must not be treated as bounty cases, because they are not charity cases. Freires essay is genuinely interesting, to say the least. The fancy of humans abusing a tack other is not exactly novel, but the concept of empowering each other to attain freedom, juxtaposed with what making love really is, is innovative. These concepts were connected by Freire. As part of the privileged class, Freire puts responsibility upon my shoulders.Instead of making me see guilty because of my status, he points out that I can be part of change. My status is not most-valuable only my commitment is. Which is why it is my responsibility to be part of the movement to change the system wherein alliance is divided into the privileged and the poor. This ideology is comparable to Daniel Defoes Education of Women. He talks about educating women in a special school designed to indoctrinate them certain subjects. Unlike Freire though, Defoe tal ks of an bringing up completely for women. This means that men receive a very different kind of education.The curriculum, of course, is decided upon by men. Freries though, talks of an education everyone receives. Also, Frerie does not talk of inactive students he is talking of a kind of education where students interact with the teacher. This is based upon the the concept that the teacher has as much to learn from the students, as the students have as much to learn from the teacher. In effect, the students mold their education as they learn. Defoe mentions no such thing. It is as if the students will forever rely on the teacher, and that the students are teachers are not equals. Which is revolutionary, actually.It has been inculcated in us that teachers are at a higher position than us. The platforms in former of classrooms emphasize this fact. We are taught to learn from them because they know so much more than us. We are made to olfaction as if we are blank slates, or so fa r empty sponges. But this is not true. We are, before decorous students, children of life. We explore the world outside, and come up with answers to explain our questions. Just as the oppressed are experienced, so are we. We have a lot to loan to the class, much more, as we can combine our kaleidoscope of experiences and argumentation it against the teachers.Freire also redefined inform as unless impart information. Freire goes beyond this to discuss humanizing people. After all, teaching is not about making robots. It is about imparting a part of yourself, sharing a piece of your soul. Freire exposes how education is used to alienate people, and then instructs how it can be redeemed. We can redeem ourselves, to turn forward from the bestiality this system enforces upon us. Freire exposes how large the system we are fighting, but at the same time, leaves hope that we can transform it. And this is the challenge Friere leaves us.